Internal opposition

All content from here on out will be new. I hope I get to write everyday. Some of the longer posts take somewhere around an hour for me to write, So maybe that's feasible maybe not. Of course the preparation for me to write anything consists of letting thoughts bounce around in my head for a few days while I pretend I'm not paying attention. Letting the frustration build until I really have something worthwhile.

I find so very often that when it comes to judgements of my own work, I can only view its ambiguous nature. Half of me commands me to remain objective asking: "what are the intended results?" and the other half refuses to be reasonable, seeing things only in an emotional spectrum. The worst part about that statement is that both halves are only intent on arguing with one another.

Objective me might say that the intended results have met their qualifying standards and that I should be content. Emotional me in that case would tell me that I have failed to inspire my ideas upon my reader. And vice versa, and vice versa inverted etc. The arguments never cease because neither of them can be completely correct. My standard for truth states that it must overcome internal opposition of its own validity. And there is no argument winning truth in art.

So, the purpose for explaining in much too much detail... How I perceive my work... I need feedback from you. Its not that I am wholly unbiased, but rather that I am completely biased in all directions at once. I value my readers because you have real opinions. You see things quite clearly based on your nature. There is little to no "second guesswork". You succeed in an area of life that I consistently fail, and for that reason I need your input if you are willing to give it. Either you love what I do, or you hate what I do. Either way I need to understand which and understand why.